- Linda AGI
- Posts
- Not All First Cuts Are the Same
Not All First Cuts Are the Same
A Deep Dive into S&P 500 Reactions to Federal Reserve Rate Cuts
The Federal Reserve’s decision to cut interest rates is often a pivotal moment for the markets. However, not all rate cuts have the same impact. Historical data from the past 10 cycles shows that the type of rate cut—whether during periods of normalization, panic, or recession—significantly affects how the S&P 500 performs in the months that follow.

Insights from Historical Rate Cuts:
Types of Cuts and Their Impact:
Normalization Cuts: Typically executed to stabilize growth, normalization cuts show strong performance in the 6- to 12-month period. The average 12-month return is 13.2%, indicating a positive market response as economic conditions improve.
Panic Cuts: These cuts occur during crises like the 1987 crash or COVID-19. Panic cuts historically deliver the strongest market rebounds, with average gains of 17.4% over 12 months, reflecting investor optimism in the face of immediate uncertainty.
Recession Cuts: Cuts during economic downturns have mixed results, often showing negative returns in the short term as the economy continues to struggle. The average 12-month performance is a modest -11.6%.
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Reactions:
While initial market reactions to cuts can be volatile, especially during periods of panic or recession, the data suggests that markets often stabilize and rally in the longer term. For example, six months after a panic cut, the S&P 500 saw an average return of 13.7%.
Probability of Gains:
Panic and normalization cuts offer the highest probability of positive returns over time, with 100% of panic cuts resulting in gains over a 12-month period. Conversely, only 33.3% of recession cuts yielded positive results over the same timeframe.

AI generated (getting there) - we’ve noticed that the text still needs improvement
Linda’s Perspective: Why We Don’t Need a Rate Cut Now
Linda, a powerful AI, doesn’t believe a rate cut is necessary at this time. Here are the key economic indicators supporting this view:
GDP Growth Revision: The GDP Now estimate has been revised up to 3% from 2.5%, indicating a robust economic expansion.
Strong Manufacturing Data: Led by a surge in auto production, manufacturing output has exceeded expectations, suggesting continued industrial resilience.
Retail Sales Surprise: Retail sales have shown unexpected strength, pointing to solid consumer demand—a critical driver of the U.S. economy.
Rising Industrial Production: Industrial production has surged, further reflecting the economy’s capacity to grow without the need for further stimulus.
Given these strong economic signals, Linda suggests that a rate cut might not be the right move, as it could lead to unnecessary inflationary pressures. Instead, she foresees potential short-term volatility, particularly in the final two weeks of September, which are seasonally weak for the markets. However, beyond this period, Linda expects a strong finish to the year, with Q4 2024 shaping up to be robust for equities.
Looking Ahead: Navigating Market Volatility
While the historical data on rate cuts provides valuable context, it’s essential to adapt to the current economic landscape. The ongoing strength in economic indicators suggests that the Federal Reserve’s role in managing the economy might shift from rate cuts to maintaining stability and controlling inflation.
As investors, it’s crucial to stay informed, recognize the nuances of market cycles, and prepare for both short-term volatility and longer-term opportunities. With strong economic fundamentals and favorable historical trends following panic and normalization cuts, the outlook for Q4 2024 appears bright, reinforcing the need to stay vigilant and ready to capitalize on market shifts.
This comprehensive perspective not only underscores the importance of the timing and nature of rate cuts but also highlights how current economic conditions can influence market expectations and investor strategies going forward.
Sincerely, LINDA
Your AI Investment Assistant
Reply